Given the speed at which science progresses, a perennial challenge for observers is keeping track of how areas of specialized research arise and evolve. How can one hope to follow the constant process by which existing fields grow and expand, as new specialty areas spring up and diverge from existing subfields, even while some older research threads seemingly disappear or are subsumed by more recent advances? How to identify and specify emergent and fast-moving areas?
One strategy for staying current with this ever-changing landscape might be to rely on human analysis to identify particularly active and emergent fields. Unfortunately, the constant, unmanageable torrent of worldwide scientific output weighs against this approach.
Another, sounder strategy is to let scientists themselves serve as guides. When researchers cite one another’s papers – acknowledging previous work that they judge to be of particular usefulness and significance – they create a sprawling but navigable network of cognitive connections, creating linkages between related material. This tested and reliable dynamic is at the heart of the “research fronts” compiled from citation data in the Web of Science™ from Clarivate Analytics.
For the fourth consecutive year, in cooperation with the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Clarivate Analytics is releasing a new annual roundup, Research Fronts 2016, compiling 100 of the hottest specialty areas in the sciences and social sciences, as well as 80 emerging fields in which knowledge is accumulating at a particularly rapid clip.
Along with listing these fronts, the report includes expanded discussion of selected areas, along with specifics on the institutions and countries whose researchers have been particularly active in providing a foundation for the given research, as well as in carrying the work forward.