Product logins

Find logins to all Clarivate products below.


Since the approval of the first biosimilar in Europe more than a decade ago, the use of biosimilars has been increasing in that region. Likewise, the FDA approved the first biosimilar in 2015, and biosimilars have been gaining traction in the United States since then. Nevertheless, for biosimilars to achieve and maintain a strong position in the major pharmaceutical markets, particularly as the competition increases, it is imperative for them to earn the trust of physicians. By elucidating physicians’ decision-making process in the use of biosimilars versus biologics, clients can learn the most important attributes a biosimilar should have. Decision Resources Group conducted primary market research in the United States, France, and Germany with physicians from six specialties to obtain insight into their experiences with and perceptions of biosimilars. In this report, we examine how physicians’ experiences and attitudes compare across specialties and countries and how they have evolved over time.

Questions Answered in This Report:

  • Understand surveyed physicians’ current level of experience and familiarity with biosimilars. How has familiarity with biosimilars progressed over time in France, Germany, and the United States? What are physicians’ opinions of indication extrapolation, and how do these attitudes vary by country and specialty? Are physicians familiar with the pharmacy-level substitution rules in their respective countries?
  • Understand the drivers of and barriers to biosimilar use among physicians from different specialties. According to physicians, which factors will stimulate uptake of biosimilars, and how do these factors vary by country? What are physicians’ concerns about using biosimilars, and how do they vary by specialty? Which companies do physicians trust most as manufacturers of biosimilars?
  • Understand how examining physicians’ attitudes can help decipher the likely use of biosimilars in the future. How will physicians adopt biosimilars initially, and how will uptake vary by specialty? How will physicians choose among multiple biosimilars of the same reference product? Do physicians expect to use new, higher-cost biologics once biosimilars are available?

Scope

Markets covered: United States, France, and Germany.

Primary research: Online quantitative survey of 547 physicians from six specialties—endocrinologists, gastroenterologists, nephrologists, rheumatologists, hematology-oncologists, and medical oncologists.

Related Market Assessment Reports

Report
Migraine – Current Treatment – Treatment Algorithms: Claims Data Analysis – Migraine Prophylaxis (US)
Migraine is a common neurological condition characterized by moderate to severe headaches; it can have a major impact on patients’ quality of life. Our quantitative analysis of treatment patterns…
Report
Biosimilars – Access & Reimbursement – Payer Insights Landscape (US/EU)
Biosimilar regulations and guidance have been defined, at least in draft form, in most the world’s leading pharmaceutical markets. In many cases, biosimilar guidance is based on that of the EMA,…
Report
Hepatitis B Virus – Geographic Focus: China – China In-Depth – Hepatitis B Virus
HBV is a major public health burden in China, with chronically infected individuals at a significantly increased risk of developing hepatic cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Current treatment…
Report
Ulcerative Colitis – Unmet Need – Unmet Need – Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis (US/EU)
The treatment landscape for ulcerative colitis (UC) is rapidly evolving. TNF-alpha inhibitors (Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine’s Remicade, AbbVie’s Humira), a CAM inhibitor (Takeda’s…
Report
Vitiligo – Current Treatment – Treatment Algorithms: Claims Data Analysis – Vitiligo (US)
Vitiligo is a chronic skin depigmentation disorder characterized by the destruction or functional loss of melanocytes. Given its visible manifestations, the disease is associated with a substantial…