The most important clinical distinction in the first-line treatment of multiple myeloma is determining whether the patient is eligible to undergo autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). Approximately one-quarter of diagnosed multiple myeloma patients are not eligible to undergo a transplant owing to their age and/or performance status. For years, melphalan-based regimens were the standard of care for these patients, but Celgene’s Revlimid and Thalomid/Thalidomide and Janssen/Takeda’s Velcade have revolutionized the treatment of transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma patients and are now the cornerstones of therapy. Nevertheless, because of the older age and comorbidities of most ASCT-ineligible patients, physicians must focus on treating the symptoms of the disease while managing the toxicity of treatment and improving patients’ quality of life. Thus, significant unmet need remains for well-tolerated agents that can also delay disease progression and extend the survival of this frail patient subpopulation.
QUESTIONS ANSWERED
What are the treatment drivers and goals that are most likely to influence a therapy’s uptake for transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma?
How do current therapies perform on key clinical drug attributes for this patient population?
What are the prevailing areas of unmet need and hidden opportunities in this patient population?
What trade-offs across different clinical attributes and price are acceptable to U.S. and European hematologist-oncologists when considering hypothetical new treatment options for first-line transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma?
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
Provides quantitative insight into U.S. and European physician perceptions of key treatment drivers and goals and the current level of unmet need for a specific disease. Commercial opportunities are analyzed, and the extent to which emerging therapies may capitalize on these opportunities is evaluated.
SCOPE OF THE REPORT
Markets covered: United States, France, Germany, United Kingdom
Primary research: Survey of 60 hematologist-oncologists in the United States and 30 medical oncologists in Europe
Stated versus derived analysis of U.S. and European physician prescribing behavior.
Conjoint analysis with U.S. and European physicians, includes market simulator.
Assessment of current drug performance against treatment drivers and goals.
Physician perceptions of unmet need in disease/subpopulation covered and related diseases/subpopulations. Analysis of remaining drug development opportunities.
Rationale for Treatment Drivers and Goals Selection
Efficacy
Safety and Tolerability
Convenience of Administration
Rationale for Drug Selection
Regimens for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma
Treatment Drivers and Goals
Key Findings: Attribute Importance
Relative Importance of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability, Convenience of Administration, and Nonclinical Attributes to Surveyed Hematologist-Oncologists' Prescribing Decisions in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma
Importance of Efficacy Attributes to Prescribing Decisions in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: United States
Importance of Efficacy Attributes to Prescribing Decisions in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: Europe
Importance of Safety and Tolerability Attributes to Prescribing Decisions in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: United States
Importance of Safety and Tolerability Attributes to Prescribing Decisions in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: Europe
Importance of Convenience of Administration Attributes to Prescribing Decisions in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: United States
Importance of Convenience of Administration Attributes to Prescribing Decisions in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: Europe
Key Findings: Stated vs. Derived Importance
Stated vs. Derived Importance of Key Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability, Convenience of Administration, and Nonclinical Attributes to Prescribing Decisions in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: United States
Stated vs. Derived Importance of Key Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability, Convenience of Administration, and Nonclinical Attributes to Prescribing Decisions in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: Europe
Product Performance Against Treatment Drivers and Goals
Key Findings
Overall Performance of Key Therapies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: United States
Overall Performance of Key Therapies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: Europe
Relative Performance of Key Therapies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Across Select Efficacy Attributes: United States
Relative Performance of Key Therapies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Across Select Efficacy Attributes: Europe
Relative Performance of Key Therapies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Across Select Safety and Tolerability Attributes: United States
Relative Performance of Key Therapies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Across Select Safety and Tolerability Attributes: Europe
Relative Performance of Key Therapies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Across Select Convenience of Administration Attributes: United States
Relative Performance of Key Therapies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Across Select Convenience of Administration Attributes: Europe
Assessment of Unmet Need
Key Findings: Unmet Need in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma
Surveyed Hematologist-Oncologistsu2019 Satisfaction with the Performance of Key Therapies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma on Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability, Convenience of Administration, and Nonclinical Factors: United States
Surveyed Hematologist-Oncologistsu2019 Satisfaction with the Performance of Key Therapies for Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma on Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability, Convenience of Administration, and Nonclinical Factors: Europe
Surveyed Hematologist-Oncologists' Ascribed Level of Unmet Need Across Key Efficacy Attributes in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: United States
Surveyed Hematologist-Oncologists' Ascribed Level of Unmet Need Across Key Efficacy Attributes in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: Europe
Surveyed Hematologist-Oncologists' Ascribed Level of Unmet Need Across Key Safety and Tolerability Attributes in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: United States
Surveyed Hematologist-Oncologists' Ascribed Level of Unmet Need Across Key Safety and Tolerability Attributes in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: Europe
Surveyed Hematologist-Oncologists' Ascribed Level of Unmet Need Across Key Convenience of Administration Attributes in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: United States
Surveyed Hematologist-Oncologists' Ascribed Level of Unmet Need Across Key Convenience of Administration Attributes in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma: Europe
Key Findings: Unmet Need in First-Line Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma and Related Indications
Surveyed Hematologist-Oncologists' Ascribed Level of Unmet Need in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma and Related Indications: United States
Surveyed Hematologist-Oncologists' Ascribed Level of Unmet Need in Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma and Related Indications: Europe
Opportunity Analysis
Areas of Opportunity in the Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Market and Emerging Therapy Insights
Opportunity: A New Therapy with Improved Progression-Free Survival
Opportunity: A Novel Agent with a Better Safety and Tolerability Profile
Opportunity: A Novel Regimen with a Simple Dosing Schedule
Conjoint Analysis-Based Simulations of Market Scenarios
First-Line Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Market Simulations: Share of Preference of Target Product Profiles Included in Scenario 1
First-Line Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Market Simulations: Likelihood to Prescribe Target Product Profiles Included in Scenario 1
First-Line Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Market Simulations: Target Product Profiles Included in Scenario 1
First-Line Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Market Simulations: Share of Preference of Target Product Profiles Included in Scenario 2
First-Line Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Market Simulations: Likelihood to Prescribe Target Product Profiles Included in Scenario 2
First-Line, Transplant-Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Market Simulations: Target Product Profiles Included in Scenario 1
Appendix
Key Abbreviations
Bibliography
Anamika Ghosh, Ph.D.
Anamika Ghosh, M.Sc., Ph.D., is a manager on the Oncology team at Clarivate. She has expertise in various solid and hematological malignancies and immune-oncology drug classes, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and CAR T-cell therapies. As a Ph.D. and postdoctoral fellow at the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Dr. Ghosh studied host-pathogen interactions during Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Dengue virus infections. She received her Ph.D. in life sciences from ICGEB and an M.Sc. in biomedical sciences from the University of Delhi.