In a landmark FDA ruling in March 2017, Ocrevus became the first disease-modifying therapy (DMT) approved for the treatment of primary-progressive multiple sclerosis (PP-MS). Although the drug’s efficacy appears more modest in this population than in patients with relapsing forms of MS, the combination of proven clinical benefits and a positive safety profile (to date) yields a highly compelling product for a deeply underserved population. Even so, questions remain about exactly how it will fit into the progressive MS treatment algorithm. DRG’s launch tracking series will examine how the perception and performance of Ocrevus has evolved through Year 1 with an MS prescriber base that has hitherto struggled to treat PP-MS.
QUESTIONS ANSWERED
What is the awareness of, familiarity with, and perception of Ocrevus among U.S. neurologists?
For which PP-MS patients are neurologists prescribing Ocrevus, what are the reasons for prescribing, and how satisfied are they with Ocrevus?
What promotional messages and activities are Genentech/Roche using to support the Ocrevus launch in PP-MS?
How does the trial and adoption of Ocrevus in PP-MS compare to the trial and adoption of Ocrevus and other recently launched products in the saturated relapsing MS market? How do adopters and nonadopters in PP-MS compare across key metrics?
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
Emerging Therapies is a three-wave series based on primary research data collected at 1, 6, and 12 months post-commercial launch with U.S. physicians. The research captures physicians’ awareness, perceptions, and use of the launched product as well as anticipated future trends. Insight is also provided on promotional efforts, prescriber and nonprescriber profiles, and benchmarking against other launched agents.
Markets covered: United States.
Primary research: Survey of approximately 75 U.S. neurologists.
Key metrics included:
Unaided and aided awareness of Ocrevus.
Familiarity with and impressions of Ocrevus.
Prescriber and nonprescriber profiles.
Willingness to prescribe Ocrevus.
Performance of Ocrevus on key attributes.
Sales representative frequency, reach, and satisfaction.
Benchmarking against previously launched MS agents.
Benchmarking Ocrevus's Launch Success vs. Other Launched Drugs
By Various Measures, Ocrevus in PP-MS Outpaces Other Benchmark DMTs for Relapsing MS at 12 Months Postlaunch
Prescriber and Nonprescriber Profiles
Differences Between Ocrevus Prescribers and Nonprescribers for PP-MS at 12 Months Postlaunch
Differences Between Ocrevus Prescriber and Nonprescriber Profiles
Ocrevus Awareness and Perceptions
Unaided and Aided Awareness of Ocrevus
High Overall Awareness of Ocrevus and its Attributes Endures at 12 Months Postlaunch
Unaided Awareness of Drugs Approved or Launched for the Treatment of MS
Aided Awareness of Ocrevus
Aided Awareness of Ocrevus's Indication
Aided Awareness of Ocrevus's Mechanism of Action
Aided Awareness of Ocrevus's Dosing Interval
Aided Awareness of the Comparator Used in Ocrevus's Pivotal Clinical Trial in PP-MS
Aided Awareness of Ocrevus's Clinical Profile in PP-MS
Familiarity with Ocrevus
Familiarity with Ocrevus Remains High at 12 Months Postlaunch
Level of Familiarity with Ocrevus
Sources of Familiarity with Ocrevus
Wave 3 Neurologists Indicate Sales Representative Interactions Are a Growing Source of Familiarity
Initial Reaction to and Interest in Ocrevus
Neurologists' Favorable Reactions to Ocrevus in PP-MS and Interest in Learning More Persists at 12 Months Postlaunch
Ocrevus's Product Profile in PP-MS
Ocrevus Information Requiring Additional Education
Initial Reaction of Neurologists to Ocrevus for the Treatment of PP-MS
Neurologists' Level of Interest in Learning More About Ocrevus
Impressions of Ocrevus
Wave 3 Neurologists Continue to Express that Ocrevus's Top Advantage is its Efficacy in and Approval for PP-MS
Unaided Advantages of Ocrevus for PP-MS
Unaided Disadvantages of Ocrevus for PP-MS
Statement Agreements About Ocrevus for PP-MS
Statement Agreements About Ocrevus for PP-MS: Mean Rating
Rating of Ocrevus's Risk/Benefit Balance for PP-MS
Prescriber and Nonprescriber Profiles
Despite Few Nonprescribers at One Year, Familiarity and Risk Aversion Fuel a Lingering Reticence to Prescribe Ocrevus in PP-MS
Differences Between Ocrevus Prescriber and Nonprescriber Profiles
Ocrevus Trial and Use
Willingness to Prescribe Ocrevus
Willingness to Prescribe Ocrevus to PP-MS Patients Climbed Higher at 12 Months Postlaunch
Willingness to Prescribe Ocrevus to PP-MS Patients
Impact of Clinical and Nonclinical Attributes on Willingness to Prescribe Ocrevus in PP-MS
Impact of Clinical and Nonclinical Attributes on Willingness to Prescribe Ocrevus in PP-MS: Mean Rating
Number of Patients Currently Receiving Ocrevus
Ocrevus Continues to Experience Strong Uptake in PP-MS Patients 12 Months Postlaunch
Number of PP-MS and Non-Relapsing SP-MS Patients Prescribed Ocrevus
Mean Number of PP-MS and Non-Relapsing SP-MS Patients Prescribed Ocrevus
Ocrevus Discontinuation Rate in PP-MS
Ocrevus Discontinuation Rate in PP-MS: Mean Number
Reasons for Discontinuing Ocrevus
Current Use of DMTs in PP-MS Patients
PP-MS Patient Inquiries About Ocrevus
PP-MS Patients Inquiries About Ocrevus: Mean Number
Percentage of PP-MS Patients Starting Ocrevus Following a Request
Categories of Current Ocrevus-Treated PP-MS Patients
Source Therapy for Current PP-MS Patients Switched to Ocrevus
Number of Prior Therapies for PP-MS Patients Switched to Ocrevus
Reasons for Starting/Switching to Ocrevus in PP-MS
Ocrevus Follow-Up Visits in PP-MS
Ocrevus Treatment Response in PP-MS
Ocrevus-Prescribed PP-MS Patients' Experience with Infusion Reactions
Reasons for Not Yet Prescribing Ocrevus
Safety Concerns and Patient Access Issues Continue to Impact Ocrevus Prescribing in PP-MS Patients
Reasons for Not Yet Prescribing Ocrevus to PP-MS Patients
Obstacles to Prescribing Ocrevus to PP-MS Patients
Anticipated Ocrevus Use
At 12 Months Postlaunch, Neurologists Expect Continued Ocrevus Penetration in the Treatment of PP-MS
Anticipated Timing for Ocrevus Prescribing to PP-MS Patients Among Current Nonprescribers
Percentage of PP-MS and Non-Relapsing SP-MS Patients Considered Ocrevus Candidates
Reasons for PP-MS Patients to Be Ineligible for Treatment with Ocrevus
Percentage of PP-MS Patients Considered Ocrevus Candidates by Treatment Situation
Current and Anticipated DMT Treatment Rates in PP-MS
Current and Anticipated DMT Treatment Rates in PP-MS: Mean Rate
Current and Anticipated Brand Allocation Among DMT-Treated PP-MS Patients
Ocrevus Performance on Key Attributes
Prescribers Remain Highly Satisfied with Ocrevus's Performance on Key Attributes at 12 Months Postlaunch
Prescribers' Overall Satisfaction with Ocrevus in PP-MS
Current Reimbursement Limitations on Ocrevus for PP-MS
Rating of Ocrevus's Performance on Clinical and Nonclinical Attributes in Treating PP-MS
Mean Rating of Ocrevus's Performance and Nonclinical Attributes in Treating PP-MS
Effectiveness of Face-to-Face Detailing for Ocrevus
Ocrevus Sales Representative Frequency and Reach
Fewer Neurologists Reported Never Having Contact with Ocrevus Sales Representatives at 12 Months Postlaunch Than in Prior Waves
Ocrevus Sales Representative Detailing Reach
Satisfaction with Ocrevus Sales Representative
Neurologists Continue to Report High Satisfaction with Ocrevus Sales Representatives at 12 Months Postlaunch
Neurologist Satisfaction with Ocrevus Sales Representatives
Neurologist Satisfaction with Ocrevus Sales Representatives: Mean Rating
Ocrevus Message Recall
Ocrevus's Approval for PP-MS Persists as a Key Message 12 Months Postlaunch
Unaided Ocrevus Message Recall During Recent Detail
Aided Ocrevus Message Recall During Recent Detail
Appendix
Abbreviations
Sarah Soucy
Sarah Soucy, M.S., is a Business Insights Analyst with the central nervous system/ophthalmology disorders group at Decision Resources Group. She has authored primary research and insights for dry and wet age-related macular degeneration and multiple sclerosis.
Prior to joining DRG, Ms. Soucy spent six years on the client side as a scientist at Pfizer in the inflammation and immunology research group with both in vitro and in vivo experience. She earned her B.S. in Animal Science with a Bioscience and Technology option and her M.S. in Nutritional Sciences from the University of New Hampshire, Durham, where she studied disordered metabolism